Research and publications

Revisiting Core-Satellite Investing - A Dynamic Model of Relative Risk Management

Tracking error is not necessarily bad. Just like with good and bad cholesterol, there is “good” tracking error, which refers to out-performance of a portfolio with respect to the benchmark, and “bad” tracking error, which refers to underperformance with respect to the benchmark. By severely restricting the amounts invested in active strategies as a result of tight tracking error constraints, investors forgo an opportunity for significant out-performance, especially during market downturns. In this paper, the authors introduce a new methodology that allows investors to gain full access to good tracking error, while maintaining the level of bad tracking error below a given threshold. A revisited version of this paper was published in the Fall 2004 issue of The Journal of Portfolio Management.

Author(s):

Noël Amenc, Philippe Malaise, Lionel Martellini

Summary:

Tracking error is not necessarily bad. Just like with good and bad cholesterol, there is “good” tracking error, which refers to out-performance of a portfolio with respect to the benchmark, and “bad” tracking error, which refers to underperformance with respect to the benchmark. By severely restricting the amounts invested in active strategies as a result of tight tracking error constraints, investors forgo an opportunity for significant out-performance, especially during market downturns. In this paper, the authors introduce a new methodology that allows investors to gain full access to good tracking error, while maintaining the level of bad tracking error below a given threshold. A revisited version of this paper was published in the Fall 2004 issue of The Journal of Portfolio Management.

Register to download PDF

Register/Log in
Type : Working paper
Date : 11/05/2012
Keywords :

Asset Allocation